According to Sarah Abood, CEO of the Financial Advice Association Australia, there is an urgent need for a cap on the CSLR advice levy and a more equitable funding model. Failure to address these issues places an undue financial burden on advisers, due to product failures. Despite the Labour government's successful passage of CSLR legislation in 2023, a Treasury review has been triggered due to the notable increases in levies for the financial advice sector, raising questions about the scheme's sustainability.
As the FY26 levy is projected to reach $70 million, climbing to $123 million by FY27, concerns over funding 'but for' AFCA determinations, where tangible capital loss is absent, remain a hot topic. Stakeholder recommendations are expected to address this issue, with suggestions for excluding such claims from CSLR likely to gain traction.
Stephen Jones' departure has also left the government’s response to the Quality of Advice Review unfinished. Key elements, like the creation of a new adviser class and the removal of safe harbour steps, remain unresolved. Associations like the Financial Services Council and the Stockbrokers and Investment Advisers Association are urging the government to finalise reforms swiftly to improve access to affordable financial advice.
The implications for consumers and the broader financial services industry are significant. Unresolved advice reforms could hinder access to affordable financial advice, critical for millions of Australians, especially those planning for retirement. Complex regulations also pose challenges; simplifying these could make financial advice more accessible and cost-effective.
Sectors like superannuation are watching keenly as these reforms affect their ability to deliver on their promises of guidance and affordable advice. Both associations and industry leaders emphasize that clarifying these reforms is crucial to support growth and reduce costs, facilitating better consumer outcomes.
Looking forward, there is an anticipation of collaboration between industry bodies and the Albanese government to finalize unresolved issues. Sarah Abood has called for the removal of unnecessary red tape and the introduction of standardised documentation, ensuring advisers can focus on client outcomes rather than regulatory compliance.
Furthermore, as the Super Members Council (SMC) has solidified its stance against compromising superannuation policies for housing initiatives, pressure mounts on the government to maintain the integrity of super contributions. The role of super funds in providing large-scale, profitable housing solutions remains a focal point for the upcoming legislative discussions.
With incoming changes in governmental roles, stakeholder cooperation will be critical in refining these policies to ensure they meet the needs of a complex and evolving financial landscape.
