DOD Bookkeeping, now in liquidation, had previously incentivized three financial advisers by paying them a total of $130,250 in bonuses. These advisers were found to have improperly encouraged clients to roll over their superannuation into self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) and subsequently purchase properties through Equiti Property, a related entity. Each bonus payment ranged from $750 to $1500, with advisers receiving multiple bonuses each year.
Equiti Financial Services offered a suite of services, including financial advice, SMSF establishment and administration, real estate recommendations through Equiti Property, and mortgage broking via Equiti Finance. However, its Australian financial services licence was revoked by ASIC in November 2024, following a payment from the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort.
During the court proceedings, testimonies from 12 clients surfaced, highlighting the firm's failure to tailor financial advice to personal circumstances. Evidence showed that two advisers earned almost $240,000 annually, with nearly 40 percent of their income stemming from bonuses—heightening concerns of conflicted advice.
The court's judgment emphasized the detrimental influence the bonus payments had on the advisers' recommendations, violating the conflicted remuneration laws introduced in 2013 under the Future of Financial Advice reforms. These laws aim to prevent financial advisers from receiving incentives that could bias their advice or product recommendations.
This ruling underscores the rigorous standards expected in Australia's SMSF sector and highlights the legal responsibilities of financial advisers to act in clients' best interests. ASIC's commitment to enforcing these standards seeks to uphold the integrity of financial advice and protect consumers from biased product promotions.
As part of its ongoing efforts to enhance accountability within the financial sector, ASIC plans to ramp up scrutiny of SMSF advice. This includes conducting comprehensive reviews, with the findings due in late 2025. The sector faces mounting pressure to raise operational standards and restrict access to SMSFs to suitable candidates, particularly as more claims may implicate the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort.
ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court highlighted the significance of the penalty, emphasizing the need for financial service licensees to prioritize client interests above all. This judgment serves as a stern warning to firms that exploit contractual loopholes for financial gain at consumers' expense.
