The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) recently published an action plan in response to 150 recommendations from the parliamentary floods inquiry and a comprehensive review of the industry code of practice. Despite the consensus among both reviews that insurers should not charge more for monthly payments than they do for annual ones, and renewal premiums should not surpass those offered to new customers, the ICA asserts that enforcing pricing policies is not within the code's remit due to competition law restrictions.

Continuous concerns have been raised about the code's enforceability and the numerous recommendations the ICA did not fully endorse. Financial Rights Legal Centre's Drew MacRae stated that around 38 recommendations are still under consideration, or have been delegated to individual companies to decide upon.

Financial Counselling Australia has expressed significant concern that the ICA's action plan does not actively address inequitable pricing practices. According to their disaster recovery co-ordinator, Louise Hayes, it is essential for insurers to address these unfair practices and incorporate them into the industry code to ensure accountability and equity.

While the ICA's action plan includes some positive initiatives, such as a framework for assisting vulnerable customers, it also drew criticism for lacking a firm commitment to enforceability. The recommendations from the inquiry suggested these policies should be embedded contractually within product disclosure statements to strengthen consumer protection.

Stephanie Tonkin, CEO of Consumer Action Law Centre, highlights the importance of rebuilding consumer trust, especially following the response to the 2022 floods. She stresses that the industry's focus should shift more towards customer welfare rather than profitability, with enforceable actions driving this change.

ICA CEO Andrew Hall noted that the action plan aims to guide industry changes over the coming years with a central focus on enhancing the customer experience. He acknowledged the necessity of collaborating with consumer advocates, regulators, and the government to tackle the underlying issues cited in the reviews.