Tyrone Shandiman, Chair of ACIL, suggests that distributing the $250 million expense across all members of the Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) would have minimal financial impact on individual insurers. He asserts that insurers have an obligation to redirect a portion of their substantial profits back to policyholders, rather than focusing solely on shareholder returns. According to Shandiman, the industry should actively participate in solutions rather than relying on government intervention alone.
The proposed funds would be allocated to support mitigation efforts in high-risk regions, offer premium relief for vulnerable consumers, create a research foundation to investigate long-term insurance affordability and availability strategies, and pilot programs that could justify significant government investment. ACIL emphasizes that insurers need to financially support these initiatives if they genuinely endorse mitigation and resilience measures.
Shandiman stresses that establishing such a fund would be a crucial step in rebuilding public trust in the insurance sector. He notes that insurers tend to propose solutions that do not require them to provide financial contributions, casting doubt on their commitment to true reform. This reluctance is juxtaposed with their record profit levels, while consumers in high-risk areas continue to face challenges in securing affordable insurance coverage.
The ACIL initiative suggests that the proposed funding could also be used to test and model strategies in support of the ICA's previously proposed $30 billion flood defense program. This program, outlined by ICA last month, calls for governmental investment over the next decade to alleviate growing concerns surrounding home insurance affordability.
The Insurance Council of Australia has acknowledged Mr. Shandiman's proposal but has not publicly committed to the initiative.
