The update is notable because it sits against a wider commercial insurance market that has generally become more competitive in several classes during 2026. Recent industry reporting on broader Australian market conditions has pointed to softer pricing for property, liability, directors and officers, professional indemnity and cyber risks. Healthcare professional liability appears to be one of the areas where that softer trend is much less reliable.

For larger healthcare programmes, Lockton’s indicative renewal observations included increases for loss-free primary layers and potentially steeper increases for excess layers, with outcomes varying according to claims experience, limits, attachment points, service profile, programme structure and market conditions at placement. The update also noted that additional capacity from some insurers has not fully offset reductions or caution from established healthcare liability markets.

Allied health practices should avoid reading those figures as a direct forecast for every small clinic renewal. The report is primarily concerned with healthcare professional liability programmes, including higher-risk and larger healthcare organisations. Even so, the underwriting themes are relevant to clinics, multidisciplinary practices and contractors because insurers often ask similar questions at different scales: what services are being performed, who is authorised to perform them, how incidents are documented and whether risk controls are actually working.

Practical review points include:

  • Checking that services, locations, telehealth activities and practitioner roles match the policy wording and proposal information.
  • Keeping clear evidence of credentialling, scope of practice, supervision, consent, escalation and incident review processes.
  • Distinguishing professional negligence exposure from premises and third-party injury risks, including public liability insurance considerations.
  • Reviewing claims-made features such as retroactive dates, notification obligations and run-off cover before changing insurers.
  • Testing whether declared limits remain realistic for contracts, funder requirements and the practice’s current service mix, using general tools such as a Professional Indemnity Insurance Calculator only as an educational starting point.

The broader message is that renewal quality may matter as much as renewal timing. A clean claims history remains helpful, but healthcare underwriters are increasingly interested in evidence: records, audit trails, complaints data, near-miss reviews and proof that corrective actions have been embedded. For allied health businesses, that makes insurance preparation part of clinical governance, not a separate annual paperwork exercise.

Author: Paige Estritori
Published: Tuesday 10th November, 2026

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this article: