Mr. Henschke, who had been self-represented throughout the proceedings, sought to challenge a determination by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA). The core issue was whether he had active insurance coverage through his superannuation accounts. Both the AFCA and the Federal Court concluded that he did not, primarily due to low account balances and the non-activation of certain legislative provisions designed to provide coverage for high-risk occupations.
This ruling underscores the necessity for individuals, especially those in high-risk professions like trucking, to proactively verify the status and adequacy of their insurance coverage within superannuation funds. Relying on assumed coverage without confirmation can lead to significant financial vulnerabilities, particularly in the event of illness or injury.
For truck drivers and transport business owners, this case serves as a cautionary tale. It is imperative to regularly review superannuation accounts and associated insurance policies to ensure they meet personal and professional needs. Engaging with financial advisors or insurance specialists can provide clarity and help in making informed decisions about coverage options.
In the broader context, this case highlights the complexities of insurance within superannuation frameworks and the potential gaps that can exist. It is a reminder for all individuals to take an active role in managing their financial and insurance affairs to safeguard against unforeseen circumstances.
Published: Thursday 26th February, 2026
Please Note: If this information affects you or is relevant to your circumstances, seek advice from a licensed professional.
